Choose State Change Location

Recreational Use & Carrying Capacity Assessment

Lookout Shoals Lake Existing Recreational Areas

There are 2 developed Duke Power-owned public recreational access areas on Lookout Shoals Lake. There are no state or county park facilities located along the lake, and Figure 3.4-1 shows the public recreational access locations. There are two commercial residential marinas on Lookout Shoals Lake. There are no public commercial non-residential marinas located on Lookout Shoals Lake. The following sections describe the Duke Power-owned public access area facilities at Lookout Shoals Lake.

Existing Duke Power-Owned Public Access Areas

The developed Duke Power-owned public access areas provide about 39 acres and about 2,492 feet of shoreline frontage of public access at Lookout Shoals Lake. Combined, the developed access areas have 3 public boat ramps, 4 loading piers, and about 74 vehicle/trailer parking spaces. Table 3.4-3 summarizes the facilities at these public access areas.

In the 1994 SMP, Duke Power proposed to improve the Lookout Shoals access area (replace 2 ramps with 2 new boat ramps, pave the site and light the parking area) and Sharon access area (replace the ramp with a new ramp, pave the site and light the parking area). The Lookout Shoals access area improvements will be completed in 2001 and the Sharon improvements will be completed in early 2002, in order not to have both sites closed at the same time, which will meet all of the 1994 SMP commitments. In addition, Duke Power has added 23 acres of land to the Lookout Shoals site.

The NCWRC has entered into a creative partnership with Duke Power for the maintenance and operation of the non-leased access areas. Under this agreement Duke Power pays the NCWRC to maintain the access areas and the NCWRC makes at least the same capital dollar amount available to Duke Power, and agency lessees for the non boat launching portion of the access areas, for improvements that will help the boating public. This agreement is a continuation of a long established partnership with the NCWRC with the added benefit of designated cost sharing capital dollars for access area improvements.

Table 3.4-3
Lookout Shoals Lake Duke Power-Owned Public Access Areas

Access Area Name Acreage Shoreline
Frontage (ft)
Boat Ramps Loading Piers Fishing Piers Car
Parking
(Spaces)
V/T*
Parking
(Spaces)
Lookout Shoals 30.3 2,237 2 3 0 0 50
Sharon 8.8 255 1 1 0 0 24
Total 39.1 2,492 3 4 0 0 74

* Vehicle/Trailer parking area.

Existing Commercial and Private Recreational Access

There are, currently, no public marinas on Lookout Shoals Lake. Private access to Lookout Shoals Lake is through private marinas and private piers along the Lookout Shoals Lake shoreline. Table 3.4-4 summarizes the number and types of public and private commercial non-residential and commercial residential marina facilities. Table 3.4-5 summarizes the estimated number of private piers.

Table 3.4-4
Summary of Lookout Shoals Lake Commercial Recreational Access Facilities

Type of Facility Commercial
Non-Residential
Commercial Residential
Public Marinas 0 0
Private Marinas 0 2
Wet Slips 0 13
Dry Slips 0 0

Table 3.4-5
Summary of Lookout Shoals Lake Private Recreational Access Facilities

Type of Facility No. Private Facilities
Piers 250

Lookout Shoals Lake Recreational Use Assessment

Visitation figures at the public access areas on Lookout Shoals Lake were derived based on estimates of the traffic entering the Duke Power-owned public access areas. Total estimated visitation during the 1999 study period for Lookout Shoals Lake at these sites was 48,780 visits. Figure 3.4-2 shows the distribution of the visitation for each month at Lookout Shoals Lake for the Duke Power-owned public access areas during the 1999 study period. A visit is considered a vehicle or vehicle/trailer entering the site for any part of a day.

Table 3.4-6 provides a summary of the estimated recreational visitation based on the traffic counter data for the sampled sites during the 1999 study period. Based on survey data input, the estimated ratio for annual visits to the project area for Survey B respondents (respondents that use both public and private access areas) as compared to Survey C respondents (respondents at the public access areas) was a ratio of 1.3 to 1. The estimated overall recreational visitation for Lookout Shoals Lake for the 1999 study period totaled 63,605 visits.

Lookout Shoals Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment

The overall boat carrying capacity is assessed based on the peak boating use estimates obtained during the flyovers in the 1999 study period. The available boating acreage was adjusted from the base boats per acreage estimate (see Table 3.4-7) by the following factors (Warren and Rea, 1989, as modified):

Factor Adjustment
1. Location of the lake in relation to population served 0
2. Multiple use of water area -
3. Shoreline configuration -
4. Amount of open water -
5. Amount of facility and shoreline development 0
6. Crowding rating 0
  Total -3

Table 3.4-7
Boat Type Acreage Adjustment
(Source:  Modified from Warren and Rea, 1989)

Boat Activity Type Low -4 -3 -2 -1 Base 1 2 3 4 High
Fishing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Canoe/kayak 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5
Motor boating 18.0 17.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 3.0
Sailing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Jet skiing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Water skiing 20.0 18.0 17.0 15.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0

Table 3.4-8 summarizes the assessment of the optimum overall boat capacity based on the usable water surface acreage and the boating activity mix identified from the surveys. Table 3.4-9 provides the assessment of the percent capacity of the boat use for Lookout Shoals Lake on the peak day during the 1999 study period. Lookout Shoals Lake during the weekday was estimated at 21 percent capacity, during the weekend at 16 percent capacity, and during the peak holiday period at 44 percent capacity for overall boating use.

Table 3.4-8
Lookout Shoals Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment

Boat Activity Usable Acreage Use Factor Opt. No. Boats % Usage Boat
Activity
Mix
Persons/ Boat Total Users
Fishing 1,305 8.0 163 42% 68 3.14 215
Canoe/Kayak 1,305 2.0 653 6% 42 3.26 137
Motor Boating 898 15.0 60 16% 10 3.90 38
Sailing 898 8.0 112 3% 4 3.36 12
Jet Skiing 898 8.0 112 19% 22 3.85 84
Water Skiing 898 17.0 53 13% 7 4.39 30
Total       100% 152   515

Table 3.4-9
Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated 1999 Study Period Boat Capacity

Peak Use Weekday % Capacity Weekend % Capacity Holiday % Capacity
No. Boats 32 21% 24 16% 67 44%

The optimum boat carrying capacity assessment provides an assessment of the total surface area available for boating use. To assess the areas of the lakes with higher density of boating use, the general location of boating activity was recorded during the flyovers for each day of aerial coverage. Figure 3.4-3 shows the location of boats during the peak use day for Lookout Shoals Lake. Figure 3.4-4 shows the boating density on Lookout Shoals Lake for the peak use day and denotes areas where the greatest clustering of boating activity occurred. Figure 3.4-5 shows the boat density map based on the composite of the three highest boating use days. This figure illustrates the areas where boating use most often occurred during the peak use days during the study period and provides an assessment of areas with high density boating during this same period.

Based on the boat capacity study in Table 3.4-9, there are no crowding problems on Lookout Shoals Lake. The highest capacity reached was 44% on a holiday weekend. The Peak Use Day Boat Density map, Figure 3.4-4 (for only one day), does show one area where the boat density is higher than the rest of the lake, but the acres available per boat for are adequate for all boating activities. When averaging the three highest boat count days, Figure 3.4-5, there is only one area where boat density is higher than the rest of the lake. For all of the remaining times during the year the boat density levels are very low.

Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated Future Recreational Demand

Table 3.4-10 provides the population projections for the counties within 50-60 miles of Lookout Shoals Lake. Population projections were conducted for the impact zone using a combination of 1970 - 1990 population data and 2000 and 2010 population projections from U.S. Census Bureau data; these figures were used to make projections for 2030, 2040, and 2050.

Table 3.4-10
Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated Population Projections for the Impact Zone

County 1999 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Burke 77,086 85,651 92,340 98,366 108,595 119,888 132,355
Wilkes 176,416 64,407 66,789 68,158 72,777 77,710 82,976
Alexander 29,121 32,357 36,056 39,314 45,333 52,273 60,275
Watauga 37,759 41,954 45,542 48,552 51,821 55,310 59,033
Avery 14,149 15,721 16,002 16,054 16,853 17,692 18,573
Caldwell 68,560 76,178 78,758 80,411 86,374 92,779 99,659
Davie 29,402 32,669 36,116 39,072 45,301 52,524 60,898
Cleveland 83,358 92,620 96,803 100,034 106,779 113,979 121,664
Lincoln 54,839 60,932 70,132 79,229 94,689 113,166 135,248
Catawba 120,581 133,979 146,217 157,650 176,071 196,645 219,623
Iredell 103,671 115,190 133,065 150,827 174,879 202,766 235,100
Total 794,942 751,658 817,820 877,667 979,473 1,094,732 1,225,404

Table 3.4-11 provides the estimated recreational use for the impact zone through the year 2050. Current use estimates are based on spot counts and responses to surveys. The recreational use projections were estimated by computing the projected population increase for the impact zone and incorporating indexed values for future recreational use for the various activities. The index values for each activity were obtained from "Outdoor Recreation in American Life: A National Assessment of Demand and Supply Trends" (Cordell, 1999). The indices are based on models that incorporate a number of variables, including age structure of the population, income, race, sex, and population density, as well as other explanatory variables. Full model parameters and estimates are available from the author.

Table 3.4-12 shows the estimated absorption percentage for the four major recreation activities that require specific lands and facilities. Picnicking, swimming, camping, and boating are activities that require specific developed facilities. The other activities listed are dispersed activities that can take place at a variety of undeveloped areas. The estimated 1999 use levels are from Table 3.4-11. The estimated demand is based on the impact zone population (population of all counties within 50-60 miles of the lake). The impact zone population is multiplied by the participation rate for the activity, which was obtained from "Emerging Markets for Outdoor Recreation in the United States: Based on the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment" (Cordell et al., 1996). Participation rates are for the South and are similar to 1995 North Carolina and South Carolina SCORP data. Specific participation rates are as follows: swimming, 37.3%; picnicking, 44.8%; camping 22.4%; boating, 45.0%. The product of the impact zone population and participation rates are then multiplied by the estimated of number of days of participation for each activity, which were obtained from the 1995 North Carolina SCORP. The 1999 estimated number of participants for each activity was then divided by the 1999 estimated demand to obtain the estimated absorption percentage. Absorption percentage is defined as the percent of total demand for the impact zone that is met by the individual lake.

Table 3.4-13 provides the estimate of the recreational facilities land acreage needed to meet the future recreational demand through the year 2050. The weighted population is the estimated impact zone population multiplied by the participation rate for each activity. The facility standards and estimated acreage needs for the facility class are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreational Facilities. The facility need is the total facility need for the impact zone based on the weighted population and the facility standards. The total facility need is then multiplied by the absorption percentage to determine the facility need for Lookout Shoals Lake. The acreage needs are then based on the Lookout Shoals Lake facility need multiplied by per unit acreage needs that are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreation Facilities. For Lookout Shoals Lake, it is estimated that 8 acres are required to accommodate future recreational facilities demand through the year 2050. This includes 1 acre of beaches, 1 acre of picnic areas, 2 acres of campsites, and 4 acres of boat ramps.

The estimated acreage needs for the reservoir are total usable acreage needs. Usable land acreage at existing developed public facilities can be counted toward meeting these needs. Duke Power sites, county and state parks, and other private and public agencies will meet these needs. Duke Power is expected to meet a portion of the future recreational land needs. The entire estimated need will be met by a combination of opportunities from all sources.

At Lookout Shoals Lake the most frequently identified recreational facility needs mentioned fishing access and picnic tables. Currently there are two access points where bank fishing can take place. Duke will work with the agencies to identify additional fishing opportunities on the development.

Table 3.4-11
Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated Future Recreational Use

Activity Est. 1999 Rec Use Rec Use 2010 Rec Use 2020 Rec Use 2030 Rec Use 2040 Rec Use 2050
Motor Boating* 9,031 9,916 10,840 12,359 14,315 16,680
Boat Fishing* 28,809 33,887 38,809 45,386 51,490 57,187
Bank/Pier Fish 15,972 18,787 21,516 25,163 28,547 31,706
Lake Swimming 21,868 25,160 28,481 33,479 39,803 47,739
Canoeing* 3,612 4,104 4,555 5,382 6,600 8,406
Jet Skiing* 12,360 13,571 14,836 16,914 19,591 22,828
Kayaking* 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tailrace Fishing 3,612 4,249 4,866 5,691 6,456 7,171
Sailing* 2,567 2,819 3,082 3,513 4,069 4,742
Water Ski/Tubing* 7,225 7,933 8,672 9,887 11,452 13,344
Backpacking 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hunting 5,419 5,719 5,945 6,326 6,563 6,771
Tent/Vehicle Camp 3,612 4,817 6,260 8,256 10,716 13,724
Windsurfing 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycling 0 0 0 0 0 0
Picnicking 8,747 10,498 12,413 15,198 18,637 22,858
Sightseeing 5,419 6,706 8,123 10,067 12,455 15,303
Hiking 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wildlife Viewing 3,612 4,693 5,996 7,640 9,353 11,023
Using Playgrounds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub-total * 63,604 72,230 80,794 93,441 107,517 123,187
Total 131,867 152,859 174,394 205,261 240,047 279,482

*Boating activities

Table 3.4-12
Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated Absorption Percentage for Reservoir

Activity Estimated 1999 Participants Estimated 1999 Demand Absorption Percentage
Swimming 21,868 2,464,026 0.9%
Picnicking 8,747 1,531,376 0.5%
Camping 3,612 596,524 0.6%
Boating 63,604 1,967,481 3.2%

Table 3.4-13
Lookout Shoals Lake Estimated Recreational Facility Land Acreage Needs

A B C D E F G H
Activity Year Weighted Population Facility Standard Facility Need Facility Class Lake James Share Acreage
Swimming 2010 305,047 1 per 50,000 6.10 beaches 0.05 0.30
  2020 327,370 1 per 50,000 6.55 beaches 0.06 0.32
  2030 365,343 1 per 50,000 7.31 beaches 0.07 0.36
  2040 405,773 1 per 50,000 8.12 beaches 0.07 0.40
  2050 450,676 1 per 50,000 9.01 beaches 0.08 0.45
Picnicking 2010 366,383 1 per 500 732.77 tables 3.66 0.37
  2020 393,195 1 per 500 786.39 tables 3.93 0.39
  2030 438,804 1 per 500 877.61 tables 4.39 0.44
  2040 487,363 1 per 500 974.73 tables 4.90 0.49
  2050 541,295 1 per 500 1,082.59 tables 5.49 0.55
Camping 2010 183,192 6 per 1,000 1,099.15 campsites 6.59 1.65
  2020 196,597 6 per 1,000 1,179.58 campsites 7.08 1.77
  2030 219,402 6 per 1,000 1,316.41 campsites 7.90 1.97
  2040 243,681 6 per 1,000 1,462.09 campsites 8.83 2.21
  2050 270,647 6 per 1,000 1,623.88 campsites 9.88 2.47
Boating 2010 368,019 1 per 4000 92.00 boat ramps 2.94 2.94
  2020 394,950 1 per 4000 98.74 boat ramps 3.16 3.16
  2030 440,763 1 per 4000 110.19 boat ramps 3.53 3.53
  2040 489,538 1 per 4000 122.38 boat ramps 3.94 3.94
  2050 543,711 1 per 4000 135.93 boat ramps 4.41 4.41
          Total Acreage for 2050 7.88