Choose State Change Location

Recreational Use & Carrying Capacity Assessment

Mountain Island Lake Existing Recreational Areas

There are 3 developed Duke Power-owned public recreational access locations (one leased to a city recreation agency) on Mountain Island Lake. In addition, there is 1 developed county nature preserve, 3 undeveloped county nature preserves, 1 proposed state educational forest, 1 city-owned conservation area, and 1 county-owned wildlife refuge along the Mountain Island Lake shoreline. Figure 3.6-1 denotes the location of the public recreational access locations. There are no public commercial non-residential and two commercial residential marinas on Mountain Island Lake. The following sections describe the Duke Power-owned public access area facilities at Mountain Island Lake.

The Mountain Island Tailrace Fishing Area has been recently leased to the City of Mount Holly for a city park. The City is planning to install 8 campsites, a restroom, an archery range, playground, picnic deck, canoe access and trails on the site.

Existing Duke Power-Owned Public Access Areas

The developed Duke Power-owned public access areas provide about 148 acres and about 7,328 feet of shoreline frontage of public access at Mountain Island Lake. Combined, the developed access areas have 6 public boat ramps, 3 loading piers, 2 fishing piers, and about 160 vehicle/trailer and 20 car parking spaces. Table 3.6-3 summarizes the facilities at the public access areas.

In the 1994 SMP, Duke Power proposed to improve the Riverbend access area (replace 3 ramps with 4 new boat ramps, replace 2 piers with 2 new loading piers and pave the parking lot). In addition Duke Power said it would add 31 acres to the Riverbend site (67 acres added). All of the recreation commitments from the1994 SMP have been met. In addition, at Neck Road access area Duke Power replaced the ramp with 2 new boat ramps, installed a loading pier, and paved, lighted the parking lot and added 3 acres of land to the site. At the Mountain Island Tailrace Fishing area, Duke Power built 2 fishing platforms and provided 49 acres of land.

The NCWRC has entered into a creative partnership with Duke Power for the maintenance and operation of the non-leased access areas. Under this agreement Duke Power pays the NCWRC to maintain the access areas and the NCWRC makes at least the same capital dollar amount available to Duke Power, and agency lessees for the non boat launching portion of the access areas, for improvements that will help the boating public. This agreement is a continuation of a long established partnership with the NCWRC with the added benefit of designated cost sharing capital dollars for access area improvements.

Table 3.6-3
Mountain Island Lake Duke Power-Owned Public Access Areas

Access Area Name Acreage Shoreline
Frontage (ft)
Boat Ramps Loading Piers Fishing Piers Car
Parking
(Spaces)
V/T*
Parking
(Spaces)
Neck Road 8.9 724 2 1 0 0 60
Riverbend 89.7 3,285 4 2 0 0 100
Mountain Island Tailrace 49.2 3,319 0 0 2 20 0
Total 147.8 7,328 6 3 2 20 160

State and County Public Recreational Facilities

There is one developed county park (Latta Plantation Nature Preserve), and one county wildlife area (Cowan's Ford Wildlife Refuge), along the Mountain Island shoreline. Both facilities are owned and operated by Mecklenburg County. There are three undeveloped recreation areas: Auten Nature Preserve and Rural Hill Nature Preserve in Mecklenburg County, and the proposed State Educational Forest in Lincoln and Gaston counties. The City of Gastonia owns a conservation area south of Highway 16 along the shoreline in Gaston county. The City of Mount Holly is in the process of developing the Mountain Island Tailrace Fishing Area (leased from Duke Power) as a city park. Table 3.6-4 summarizes the recreational facilities provided at the Latta Plantation Nature Preserve. The facilities at Cowan's Ford Wildlife Refuge include a wildlife viewing platform.

Table 3.6-4
Summary of Latta Plantation Nature Preserve Public Recreational Facilities

Site Description/Facility Number
Site Acreage 1,290
Shoreline Footage 48,000
Canoe Access 2
Canoe and Jon Boat Rental 1
Fishing Pier with 2 slips 1
Concession Areas 2
Gravel Parking Spaces 225
Beach Area 1
Horseshoe Pits 2
Equestrian Center 1
Historic Building 1
Horse Arenas 2
Horse Barns with 194 Stalls 4
Maintenance Facility and Office Complex 1 each
Picnic Tables 15
Raptor Center Hospital 1
Restroom Units 32
Shelters 2
Miles of Horseback Trails 14
Miles of Nature Trails 18
Volleyball Courts 2
Backyard Habitat Education Area 1
Caretaker’s Residence 1
34 Acre Piedmont Prairie Restoration Area 1

Existing Commercial and Private Recreational Access

There are no public commercial non-residential and two commercial residential marinas on Mountain Island Lake. Private access to Mountain Island Lake is through private marinas and private piers along the Mountain Island Lake shoreline. Table 3.6-5 summarizes the number of commercial facilities. Table 3.6-6 provides the estimated number of private piers.

Table 3.6-5
Summary of Mountain Island Lake Commercial Recreational Access Facilities

Type of Facility Commercial
Non-Residential
Commercial Residential
Public Marinas 0 0
Private Marinas 0 2
Wet Slips 0 287
Dry Slips 0 0

Table 3.6-6
Summary of Mountain Island Lake Private Recreational Access Facilities

Type of Facility No. Private Facilities
Piers 315

Mountain Island Lake Recreational Use Assessment

Visitation figures at the public access areas on Mountain Island Lake were derived based on estimates of the traffic entering the Duke Power-owned public access areas. Total estimated visitation during the 1999 study period for Mountain Island Lake at these sites was 99,135 visits. Figure 3.6-2 shows the distribution of the visitation for each month at Mountain Island Lake for the Duke Power-owned public access areas during the 1999 study period. A visit is considered a vehicle or vehicle/trailer entering the site for any part of a day.

Table 3.6-7 provides a summary of the estimated recreational visitation based on the traffic counter data for the sampled sites during the 1999 study period. Based on survey data input, the estimated ratio for annual visits to the project area for Survey B respondents (respondents that use both public and private access areas) compared to Survey C respondents (respondents at the public access areas) was a ratio of 1.3 to 1. The estimated overall recreational visitation for Mountain Island Lake for the 1999 study period totaled 125,750 visits.

The overall boat carrying capacity is assessed based on the peak boating use estimates obtained during the flyovers in the 1999 study period. The available boating acreage was adjusted from the base boats per acreage estimate (see Table 3.6-8) by the following factors (Warren and Rea, 1989, as modified):

Factor Adjustment
1. Location of the lake in relation to population served 0
2. Multiple use of water area -
3. Shoreline configuration -
4. Amount of open water -
5. Amount of facility and shoreline development 0
6. Crowding rating 0
  Total -3

Table 3.6-8
Boat Type Acreage Adjustment
(Source:  Modified from Warren and Rea, 1989)

Boat Activity Type Low -4 -3 -2 -1 Base 1 2 3 4 High
Fishing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Canoe/kayak 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5
Motor boating 18.0 17.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 3.0
Sailing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Jet skiing 10.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.0 3.3 3.0 2.3 2.0
Water skiing 20.0 18.0 17.0 15.0 14.0 12.0 11.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0

Table 3.6-9 summarizes the assessment of the optimum overall boat capacity based on the usable water surface acreage and the boating activity mix identified from the surveys. Table 3.6-10 provides the assessment of the percent capacity of the boat use for Mountain Island Lake on the peak day during the 1999 study period. Mountain Island Lake during the weekday was estimated at 20 percent capacity, during the weekend at 36 percent capacity, and during the peak holiday period at 25 percent capacity for overall boating use.

Table 3.6-9
Mountain Island Lake Boat Carrying Capacity Assessment

Boat Activity Usable Acreage Use Factor Opt. No. Boats % Usage Boat
Activity
Mix
Persons/ Boat Total Users
Fishing 3,281 8.0 410 40% 164 3.14 515
Canoe/Kayak 3,281 2.0 1,641 11% 181 3.26 590
Motor Boating 2,241 15.0 149 32% 47 3.90 185
Sailing 2,241 8.0 280 0% - 3.36 -
Jet Skiing 2,241 8.0 280 8% 23 3.85 89
Water Skiing 2,241 17.0 132 9% 12 4.39 54
Total       100% 427   1,433

Table 3.6-10
Mountain Island Lake Estimated 1999 Study Period Boat Capacity

Peak Use Weekday % Capacity Weekend % Capacity Holiday % Capacity
No. Boats 86 20% 152 36% 107 25%

The optimum boat carrying capacity assessment provides an assessment of the total surface area available for boating use. To assess the areas of the lakes with higher density of boating use, the general location of boating activity was recorded during the flyovers for each day of aerial coverage. Figure 3.6-3 shows the location of boats during the peak use day for Mountain Island Lake. Figure 3.6-4 shows the boating density on Mountain Island Lake for the peak use day and denotes areas with the greatest clustering of boating activity. Figure 3.6-5 shows the boat density map based on the composite of the four highest boating use days. This figure illustrates the areas where boating use most often occurred during the peak use days during the study period and provides an assessment of areas with high density boating during this same period.

Based on the boat capacity study in Table 3.6-10, there are no crowding problems on Mountain Island Lake. The highest capacity reached was about 36% capacity on a weekend and 25% capacity on holiday weekends. The Peak Use Day Boat Density map, Figure 3.6-4 (for only one day), does show two areas where the boat density is higher than the rest of the lake, but the acres available per boat for are adequate for most boating activities. When averaging the four highest boat count days, Figure 3.6-5, there is only one area where boat densities are higher than the rest of the lake. For all of the remaining times during the year the boat density levels are low.

Mountain Island Lake Estimated Future Recreational Demand

Table 3.6-11 provides the population projections for the counties within 50-60 miles of Mountain Island Lake. Population projections were conducted for the impact zone using a combination of 1970 - 1990 population data and 2000 and 2010 population projections from U.S. Census Bureau data and were used to make projections for 2030, 2040, and 2050.

Table 3.6-11
Mountain Island Lake Estimated Population Projections for the Impact Zone

County 1999 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Cabarrus 111,064 123,404 144,126 165,168 193,710 227,183 266,441
Catawba 120,581 133,979 146,217 157,650 176,071 196,645 219,623
Cleveland 83,358 92,620 96,803 100,034 106,779 113,979 121,664
Davie 29,402 32,669 36,116 39,072 45,301 52,524 60,898
Gaston 164,090 182,322 186,268 189,339 198,875 208,891 219,412
Iredell 103,671 115,190 133,065 150,827 174,879 202,766 235,100
Lincoln 54,839 60,932 70,132 79,229 94,689 113,166 135,248
Mecklenburg 583,475 648,305 776,521 909,800 1,099,403 1,328,519 1,605,383
Rowan 114,836 127,595 141,998 156,886 175,339 195,962 219,012
Total 1,365,314 1,517,016 1,731,246 1,948,005 2,265,046 2,639,635 3,082,781

Table 3.6-12 provides the estimated recreational use for the impact zone through the year 2050. Current use estimates are based on spot counts and responses to surveys. The recreational use projections were estimated by computing the projected population increase for the impact zone and incorporating indexed values for future recreational use for the various activities. The index values for each activity were obtained from "Outdoor Recreation in American Life: A National Assessment of Demand and Supply Trends" (Cordell, 1999). The indices are based on models that incorporate a number of variables, including age structure of the population, income, race, sex, and population density, as well as other explanatory variables. Full model parameters and estimates are available from the author.

Table 3.6-13 shows the estimated absorption percentage for the four major recreation activities that require specific lands and facilities. Picnicking, swimming, camping, and boating are activities that require specific developed facilities. The other activities listed are dispersed activities that can take place at a variety of undeveloped areas. The estimated 1999 use levels are from Table 3.6-12. The estimated demand is based on the impact zone population (population of all counties within 50-60 miles of the lake). The impact zone population is multiplied by the participation rate for the activity, which was obtained from "Emerging Markets for Outdoor Recreation in the United States: Based on the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment" (Cordell et al., 1996). Participation rates are for the South and are similar to 1995 North Carolina and South Carolina SCORP data. Specific participation rates are as follows: swimming, 37.3%; picnicking, 44.8%; camping, 22.4%; and boating, 45.0%. The product of the impact zone population and participation rates are then multiplied by the estimated of number of days of participation for each activity, which were obtained from the 1995 North Carolina SCORP. The 1999 estimated number of participants for each activity was then divided by the 1999 estimated demand to obtain the estimated absorption percentage. Absorption percentage is defined as the percent of total demand for the impact zone that is met by the individual lake.

Table 3.6-14 provides the estimate of the recreational facilities land acreage needed to meet the future recreational demand through the year 2050. The weighted population is the estimated impact zone population multiplied by the participation rate for each activity. The facility standards and estimated acreage needs for the facility class are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreational Facilities. The facility need is the total facility need for the impact zone based on the weighted population and the facility standards. The total facility need is then multiplied by the absorption percentage to determine the facility need for Mountain Island Lake. The acreage needs are then based on the Mountain Island Lake facility need multiplied by per unit acreage needs that are based on State SCORPS and FERC Guidelines for Outdoor Recreation Facilities. For Mountain Island Lake, it is estimated that 18 acres are required to accommodate future recreational facilities demand through the year 2050. This includes 1 acres of beaches, 1 acres of picnic areas, 4 acres of campsites, and 13 acres of boat ramps.

The estimated acreage needs for the reservoir are total usable acreage needs. Usable land acreage at existing developed public recreation facilities can be counted toward these needs. Duke Power sites, county and state parks, and other private and public agencies will meet these needs. Duke Power is expected to meet a portion of the future recreational land needs. The entire estimated need will be met by a combination of opportunities from all sources.

For Mountain Island Lake, the most frequently identified recreational facility needs mentioned were for more boat ramps and restrooms. Duke Power has increased the number of boat ramps and parking spaces at the public access areas. Duke Power is also working with the county recreation agencies for the development of additional recreation facilities, including restrooms, at the access areas upon signing of a lease.

Table 3.6-12
Mountain Island Lake Estimated Future Recreational Use

Activity Est. 1999 Rec Use Rec Use 2010 Rec Use 2020 Rec Use 2030 Rec Use 2040 Rec Use 2050
Motor Boating* 38,619 44,458 50,914 60,227 72,340 87,391
Boat Fishing* 53,892 66,258 79,329 96,173 113,226 130,607
Bank/Pier Fish 56,677 69,681 83,428 101,142 119,076 137,355
Lake Swimming 20,366 24,515 29,027 35,364 43,560 54,111
Canoeing* 10,808 12,853 14,934 18,284 23,206 30,550
Jet Skiing* 10,375 11,944 13,678 16,180 19,435 23,478
Kayaking* 1,249 1,438 1,646 1,947 2,356 2,907
Tailrace Fishing 2,498 3,071 3,677 4,457 5,248 6,053
Sailing* 0 0 0 0 0 0
Water Ski/Tubing* 10,808 12,442 14,248 16,855 20,245 24,457
Backpacking 2,498 3,395 4,510 6,055 7,913 10,220
Hunting 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tent/Vehicle Camp 3,747 5,195 7,021 9,562 12,820 16,969
Windsurfing 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycling 1,249 1,576 1,968 2,516 3,039 3,640
Picnicking 8,742 10,957 13,526 17,140 21,753 27,612
Sightseeing 8,742 11,284 14,256 18,278 23,397 29,749
Hiking 6,244 8,293 10,703 13,937 17,716 22,114
Wildlife Viewing 9,991 13,510 17,965 23,661 29,979 36,618
Using Playgrounds 1,249 1,567 1,922 2,409 3,032 3,824
Sub-total* 125,750 149,393 174,749 209,666 250,808 299,390
Total 247,753 302,437 362,752 444,187 537,341 647,655

* Boating activities

Table 3.6-13
Mountain Island Lake Estimated Absorption Percentage for Reservoir

Activity Estimated 1999 Participants Estimated 1999 Demand Absorption Percentage
Swimming 20,366 4,231,968 0.5%
Picnicking 8,742 2,630,141 0.3%
Camping 3,747 1,024,531 0.4%
Boating 125,750 3,379,152 3.7%

Table 3.6-14
Mountain Island Lake Estimated Recreational Facility Land Acreage Needs

A B C D E F G H
Activity Year Weighted Population Facility Standard Facility Need Facility Class Mountain Island Lake Share Acreage
Swimming 2010 645,755 1 per 50,000 12.92 beaches 0.06 0.36
  2020 726,606 1 per 50,000 14.53 beaches 0.07 0.40
  2030 844,862 1 per 50,000 16.90 beaches 0.08 0.46
  2040 984,584 1 per 50,000 19.69 beaches 0.10 0.54
  2050 1,149,878 1 per 50,000 23.00 beaches 0.11 0.63
Picnicking 2010 775,598 1 per 500 1,551.20 tables 4.65 0.47
  2020 872,706 1 per 500 1,745.41 tables 5.24 0.52
  2030 1,014,741 1 per 500 2,029.48 tables 6.09 0.61
  2040 1,182,557 1 per 500 2,365.11 tables 7.10 0.71
  2050 1,381,086 1 per 500 2,762.17 tables 8.29 0.83
Camping 2010 387,799 6 per 1,000 2,326.79 campsites 9.31 2.33
  2020 436,353 6 per 1,000 2,618.12 campsites 10.47 2.62
  2030 507,370 6 per 1,000 3,044.22 campsites 12.18 3.04
  2040 591,278 6 per 1,000 3,547.67 campsites 14.19 3.55
  2050 690,543 6 per 1,000 4,143.26 campsites 16.57 4.14
Boating 2010 779,061 1 per 4000 194.77 boat ramps 7.21 7.21
  2020 876,602 1 per 4000 219.15 boat ramps 8.11 8.11
  2030 1,019,271 1 per 4000 254.82 boat ramps 9.43 9.43
  2040 1,187,836 1 per 4000 296.96 boat ramps 10.99 10.99
  2050 1,387,252 1 per 4000 346.81 boat ramps 12.83 12.83
          Total Acreage for 2050 18.44