18. Guarantees and Indemnifications
Duke Energy and certain of its subsidiaries have various financial and performance
guarantees and indemnifications which are issued in the normal course of business.
As discussed below, these contracts include performance guarantees, stand-by
letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and indemnifications. Duke
Energy enters into these arrangements to facilitate a commercial transaction
with a third party by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party.
Mixed Oxide (MOX) Guarantees. DCS is the prime contractor to
the DOE under a contract (the Prime Contract) in which DCS will design, construct,
operate and deactivate a MOX fuel fabrication facility (MOX FFF). The domestic
MOX fuel project was prompted by an agreement between the U.S. and the Russian
Federation to dispose of excess plutonium in their respective nuclear weapons
programs by fabricating MOX fuel and irradiating such MOX fuel in commercial
nuclear reactors. As of December 31, 2003, Duke Energy Corporation, through
its indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Project Services Group, Inc. (DPSG),
held a 40% ownership interest in DCS. Additionally, Duke Power has entered into
a subcontract with DCS (the Duke Power Subcontract) to prepare the McGuire and
Catawba nuclear reactors (the Nuclear Reactors) for use of the MOX fuel and
to provide for certain terms and conditions applicable to the purchase of MOX
fuel produced at the MOX FFF for use in the Nuclear Reactors.
DPSG and the other owners of DCS have issued a guarantee to the DOE (the DOE
Guarantee) pursuant to which the owners of DCS jointly and severally guarantee
to the DOE all of DCS’ payment and performance obligations under the Prime
Contract. The Prime Contract consists of a “Base Contract” phase
and four option phases. The DOE has the right to extend the term of the Prime
Contract to cover the four option phases on a sequential basis, subject to DCS
and DOE reaching agreement, through good-faith negotiations on certain remaining
open terms applying to each of the option phases. Each of the four option phases
will be negotiated separately, as the time for exercising each option phase
becomes due under the Prime Contract. If the DOE does not exercise its right
to extend the term of the Prime Contract to cover any or all of the option phases,
DCS’ performance obligations under the Prime Contract will end upon completion
of the then-current performance phase. Additionally, the DOE has the right to
terminate the Prime Contract for convenience at any time. Under the Base Contract
phase, which covers the design of the MOX FFF and design modifications to the
Nuclear Reactors, DCS is to receive cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee. The
first option phase includes the modification of Nuclear Reactors and related
Duke Power facilities, and provides for DCS to receive cost reimbursement plus
an incentive fee. The second option phase includes the construction and cold
startup of the MOX FFF and provides for DCS to receive cost reimbursement plus
an incentive fee. The third option phase provides for taking the MOX FFF from
cold to hot startup, operation of the MOX FFF, and irradiation of the MOX fuel
in the Nuclear Reactors; and provides for DCS to receive a cost reimbursement
plus an incentive fee through hot startup and, thereafter, cost-sharing plus
a fee. The fourth option phase involves DCS’ deactivation of the MOX FFF
in exchange for a fixed price payment. In September 2003, the DOE exercised
its right to extend the term of the Prime Contract to cover the first option
and add the related terms and conditions. As of December 31, 2003, DCS’
performance obligations under the Prime Contract included only the Base Contract
phase and the first option phase.
Additionally, DPSG and the other owners of DCS have issued a guarantee to Duke
Power (the Duke Power Guarantee) under which the owners of DCS jointly and severally
guarantee to Duke Power all of DCS’ payment and performance obligations
under the Duke Power Subcontract or any other agreement between DCS and Duke
Power implementing the Prime Contract. The Duke Power Subcontract consists of
a “Base Subcontract” phase and three option phases. DCS has the
right to extend the term of the Duke Power Subcontract to cover the three option
phases on a sequential basis, subject to Duke Power and DCS reaching agreement,
through good-faith negotiations on certain remaining open terms applying to
each of the option phases. Under the Base Subcontract phase, Duke Power will
perform technical and regulatory work required to prepare the Nuclear Reactors
to use MOX fuel and will receive cost reimbursement plus a fixed fee. The first
option phase includes Duke Power’s modification of the Nuclear Reactors
and related Duke Power facilities, and provides for Duke Power to receive cost
reimbursement plus a fee. The second option phase includes Duke Power performance
of additional technical and regulatory work, and provides for Duke Power to
receive cost reimbursement plus a fee. The third option phase provides for Duke
Power to purchase from DCSMOX fuel produced at the MOX FFF for use in the Nuclear
Reactors, at discounts to prices of equivalent uranium fuel, over a 15-year
period starting upon completion of the first option phase. In October 2003,
DCS exercised its right to extend the term of the Duke Power Subcontract to
cover the first option phase and add the related terms and conditions. As of
December 31, 2003, Duke Power’s performance obligations under the Duke
Power Subcontract included only the Base Subcontract phase and the first option
phase.
The cost reimbursement nature of DCS’ commitment under the Prime Contract
and the Duke Power Subcontract limits the exposure of DCS. Credit risk to DCS
is limited in that the Prime Contract is with the DOE, a U.S. governmental entity.
DCS is under no obligation to perform any contract work under the Prime Contract
before funds have been appropriated from the U.S. Congress with respect to such
work.
Duke Energy is unable to estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments
DPSG could be required to make under the DOE Guarantee and the Duke Power Guarantee
due to the uncertainty of whether: (i) the DOE will exercise its options under
the Prime Contract; (ii) the parties to the Prime Contract and the Duke Power
Subcontract, respectively, will reach agreement on the remaining open terms
for each option phase under the contracts, and if so, what the terms and conditions
might be; and (iii) the U.S. Congress will authorize funding for DCS’
work under the Prime Contract. Even though neither the DOE Guarantee nor the
Duke Power Guarantee provide for a specific limitation on a guarantor’s
payments, any liability of DPSG under the DOE Guarantee or the Duke Power Guarantee
is directly related to and limited by the terms and conditions contained in
the Prime Contract and the Duke Power Subcontract and any other agreements between
Duke Power and DCS implementing the Prime Contract, respectively. DPSG also
has recourse to the other owners of DCS for any amounts paid under the DOE Guarantee
or the Duke Power Guarantee in excess of its proportional ownership percentage
of DCS.
As of December 31, 2003, Duke Energy had no liabilities recorded on its Consolidated
Balance Sheet for the above mentioned MOX guarantees.
Other Guarantees and Indemnifications. Duke Capital has issued
performance guarantees to customers and other third parties that guarantee the
payment and performance of other parties, including certain non-wholly owned
entities. The maximum potential amount of future payments Duke Capital could
have been required to make under these performance guarantees as of December
31, 2003 was approximately $650 million. Of this amount, approximately $375
million relates to guarantees of the payment and performance of less than wholly
owned consolidated entities. Approximately $25 million of the performance guarantees
expire between 2004 and 2005, approximately $300 million expire in 2006 and
thereafter, with the remaining performance guarantees having no contractual
expiration. Additionally, Duke Capital has issued joint and several guarantees
to certain of the D/FD project owners, which guarantee the performance of D/FD
under its engineering, procurement and construction contracts and other contractual
commitments. These guarantees have no contractual expiration and no stated maximum
amount of future payments that Duke Capital could be required to make. Additionally,
Fluor Enterprises, Inc., as 50% owner in D/FD, has issued similar joint and
several guarantees to the same D/FD project owners. In accordance with the D/FD
partnership agreement, each of the D/FD partners is responsible for 50% of any
payments to be made under these guarantee contracts.
Westcoast has issued performance guarantees to third parties guaranteeing the
performance of unconsolidated entities, such as equity method projects, and
of entities previously sold by Westcoast to third parties. These performance
guarantees require Westcoast to make payment to the guaranteed third party upon
the failure of the unconsolidated entity to make payment under certain of its
contractual obligations, such as debt, purchase contracts and leases. The maximum
potential amount of future payments Westcoast could have been required to make
under these performance guarantees as of December 31, 2003 was approximately
$50 million. Of these guarantees, approximately $30 million expire from 2004
to 2007, with the remainder expiring after 2007 or having no contractual expiration.
Duke Capital uses bank-issued stand-by letters of credit to secure the performance
of non-wholly owned entities to a third party or customer. Under these arrangements,
Duke Capital has payment obligations to the issuing bank which are triggered
by a draw by the third party or customer under the letter of credit due to the
failure of the non-wholly owned entity to perform according to the terms of
its underlying contract. These letters of credit principally expire in 2004.
The maximum potential amount of future payments Duke Capital could have been
required to make under these letters of credit as of December 31, 2003 was approximately
$200 million. Of this amount, approximately $150 million relates to letters
of credit issued on behalf of less than wholly owned consolidated entities.
Duke Capital has guaranteed the issuance of surety bonds, obligating itself
to make payment upon the failure of a non-wholly owned entity to honor its obligations
to a third party. As of December 31, 2003, Duke Capital had guaranteed approximately
$75 million of outstanding surety bonds related to obligations of non-wholly
owned entities. These bonds expire in various amounts, primarily in 2004. Of
this amount, approximately $15 million relates to obligations of less than wholly
owned consolidated entities.
Natural Gas Transmission and International Energy have issued certain guarantees
of debt associated with non-consolidated entities and less than wholly-owned
entities. In the event that non-consolidated entities or less than wholly-owned
entities default on the debt payments, Natural Gas Transmission or International
Energy would be required to perform under the guarantees and make payment on
the outstanding debt balance of the non-consolidated entity. As of December
31, 2003, Natural Gas Transmission was the guarantor of approximately $15 million
at Westcoast of debt associated with less than wholly-owned entities, with no
contractual expiration. International Energy was the guarantor of approximately
$10 million of debt associated with less than wholly-owned entities, which principally
expire in 2004.
Duke Energy has certain guarantees issued to customers or other third parties
related to the payment or performance obligations of certain entities that were
previously wholly owned but which have been sold to third parties, such as DukeSolutions
and DE&S. These guarantees are primarily related to payment of lease obligations,
debt obligations and performance guarantees related to goods and services provided.
In connection with the sale of DE&S, Duke Energy has received back-to-back
indemnification from the buyer indemnifying Duke Energy for any amounts paid
by Duke Energy related to the DE&S guarantees. In connection with the sale
of DukeSolutions, Duke Energy received indemnification from the buyer for the
first $2.5 million paid by Duke Energy related to the DukeSolutions guarantees.
Additionally, for certain performance guarantees, Duke Energy has recourse to
subcontractors involved in providing services to a customer. These guarantees
have various terms ranging from 2004 to 2019, with others having no specific
term. Duke Energy is unable to estimate the total maximum potential amount of
future payments under these guarantees since some of the underlying guaranteed
agreements contain no limits on potential liability.
Duke Energy has entered into various indemnification agreements related to purchase
and sale agreements and other types of contractual agreements with vendors and
other third parties. These indemnification agreements typically cover environmental,
tax, litigation and other matters, as well as breaches of representations, warranties
and covenants set forth in these agreements. Typically, claims may be made by
third parties under these indemnification agreements for various periods of
time depending on the nature of the claim. Duke Energy’s maximum potential
exposure under these indemnification agreements can range from a specified dollar
amount to an unlimited amount depending on the nature of the claim and the particular
transaction. Duke Energy is unable to estimate the total maximum potential amount
of future payments under these indemnification agreements due to several factors,
including uncertainty as to whether claims will be made under these indemnities.
As of December 31, 2003, the amounts recorded for the guarantees and indemnifications
mentioned above are immaterial both individually and in the aggregate.